Angular, React, Vue: JavaScript frameworks compared

When because React, Angular, and Vue, the leading thing to note is that they carry the same apprehension at their cores: data restrictive. The idea here is that the framework assumes the work of tying the state of the application to the nimble ingredients of the interface. Each framework has its own specialtys for accomplishing this, but it is the increased clarity of design in state-driven data restrictive that distinguishes this age of frameworks from the antecedent one.

This kind of automatic state-driven architecture is sometimes referred to as a renimble order.

[ Also on InfoWorld: The most precious software educeer skills to get hired now ]

State-driven ingredients

Figure 1 describes how state manifestation is feeld without such frameworks. Figure 2 describes how it is feeld with the frameworks.

Figure 1. Without data restrictive


Figure 1.

Figure 2. With data restrictive via Angular, React, and Vue


Figure 2.


The frameworks also align in being ingredient-based. This is not a new idea: Each area of the user interface is portrayed by a ingredient. The code in the ingredient determines what is displayed and how the view behaves. Bundling state-driven data restrictive into ingredients delivers the nice gain to all three frameworks that makes them higher in intricate interfaces to what went precedently.

Industry adoption profiles

Now we will take a look at the nearness of each framework in the activity, to get a look at the level of adoption and viability. What I mean here is, when you select a framework for a new project, or decide on which framework to acquire, you want to be sure you are adopting a framework that is going to be lucky over the long term.

Figure 3 looks at the number of watchers each framework has on Stack Overflow. A few things are clear from this chart. All three frameworks have a powerful nearness on Stack Overflow, although Vue is far behind with just over 50,000 watchers. ReactJS has a commanding lead, which has increased over the past year.

Figure 3. Stack Overflow Watchers


Figure 3.

Figure 4 looks at GitHub stars. Here Angular takes last locate, lagging far behind. Interestingly, Vue is in the lead, and well advanced of React, indicating a big deal of inquisitiveness (if not educeed use) in the project. In each case, over the last year, the frameworks have shown increasing interest at almost the same rate.

Figure 4. GitHub Stars


Figure 4.

GitHub stars tend to recur nation’s speculative interest in a project. Figure 5 looks at weekly NPM downloads, which is an indicator of nimble, useful use of the projects.

Popularity take-away

Each of these frameworks appears to have sufficient up-take to be long-term viable. React’s popularity resources it is easier to find educeers who know it, and easier to find reapplyers that are hiring for it.

Figure 5. NPM downloads (weekly)


Figure 5.

The fact that leaps out in Figure 5 is that the educeed nimble use of frameworks goes to ReactJS by a landslide. React has almost twice as many weekly downloads as the other two frameworks combined. It’s no startle that React is the most in-use framework, but it’s notable just how expressive its lead is.

Technical comparison

You’ve seen how the frameworks are conceptually correspondent, and had a look at their referring nearness in the activity. Now let’s have a look at their technical aspects.


Angular 2+ was “designed from over.” That is, a bunch of keen nation sat down and determined what would make for the last front-end JavaScript framework.

In many ways, they succeeded: Angular is a very complete framework. On the other hand, Angular can feel overwhelming to acquire and use the framework, as you are without required to conquer a big set of interacting ingredients (labors, dependency injection, etc.) to accomplish anything.

Angular is intended to incorporate everything you might need to educe big-scale front ends. In comparison, React relies upon aggregation-educeed plug-ins (for router support, for entreaty).

Ultimately, you as a educeer are within a code-thought-machine that wants you to agree to its mentals and conventions.

On the plus side, the wholesale adoption of RenimbleX (RxJS) athwart the board is innovative and advanced-thinking. Not only does it mean all the occurrence handling needs (intra-ingredient, inter-ingredient, back-end labor calls, etc.) are managed via the same mechanism, but the same well-built framework (RenimbleX) and its acquireing will convey to any other speech you can conceive.

Moreover, big-scale projects with many team limbs may boon from the more stiff and well-markd architectural phraseology present in Angular.

There are varying opinions almost the boons and drawbacks of TypeScript, but you will code and read TypeScript if you use Angular. Another executive up-front determination.

Angular adopts ECMAScript classes wholesale. These classes use the built-in state as the ingredient state. These are decorated with explanations to mark their metadata.

Views in Angular are correspondent to views in Vue in that they are direct HTML templates with additional data-restrictive and logic support via inline directives.

Angular uses NgRX/store as its built-in, centralized state treatment plug-in.

Angular ingredient sample

Listing 2 displays a opposed ingredient correspondent to the React sample, and is derived from this sample.

    selector: `app`,
    template: `
    <button (click)="increment()">Increment</button>
    <button (click)="decrement()">Decrement</button>
ship class App {
    open opposed : number = 0;

      this.opposed += 1;

      this.opposed -= 1;

bootstrap(App, []);

Notice the @Component explanation. This is a “decorator” that informs Angular that the JavaScript class that follows is a ingredient. Other features like labors are feeld in a correspondent form.

Also remark that the state is feeld as a class limb: open opposed. This is a fairly clean way to build ingredients atop JavaScript’s indigenous syntax.

The internimble part of the ingredient is added to the button ingredients via the (click) directive that is analagous to the DOM order onClick, but allows for calling orders on the ingredient class. In this case it executes the increment and decrement orders.

Finally, the inline evidence {{opposed}} allows for outputting the data-bound changeable. This is slightly different from React’s syntax, but almost the same, and serves the same purpose.


React’s force is that it has fundamentalally grown up from in-the-world use and has continued to educe in response to weighty usage. It has undergone extensive growth, but its roots and ongoing gains reside in its being a framework used by Facebook for its own applications.

You can see Facebook’s committment to driving alteration in the framework with advanced-looking features like Concurrent Mode (quiet in experimental mode at the time of writing).

React has also aggressively educeed what is known as “pure” or officeal ingredients and hooks to empower them. These ingredients quit some of the overhead of class-based ingredients. Vue has some support for officeal ingredients, and it is practicable to form them in Angular, but React is the clear chief in this area.

Component determination and interactions are referringly directadvanced in React, honoring the source of smallest startle.

As long as you quit unnamed Redux usage, the handling of React with a big-scale application is as good as Vue. Angular feels big code bases in a congruous mode and can propose boons over React in this area. It is practicable to mark graceful big-scale apps in React, but the framework itself isn’t going to do as much as Angular to urge that determination.

React uses an immutable state object affable only via setState() to portray ingredient state. This is different from Vue and Angular, which reapply a more built-in JavaScript access to state data.

React reapplys JSX for its view templates. JSX is an interesting access in that it is like HTML with JavaScript superpowers (or JavaScript with HTML superpowers, if you choose). JSX can be a bit off-putting when leading acquireing the framework. It works perfectly well in the long run and is not hard to acquire if you arleady know HTML and JavaScript.

React’s lapse centralized data treatment is feeld via Redux.

React ingredient sample

Listing 1 has a single ingredient sample in React, derived from the React docs. This is a officeal ingredient, as that is the first way to build ingredients going advanced.

introduce React, { useState } from `recoil`;

office Example() {
  const [compute, setCount] = useState(0);

  recur (
      <p>You clicked {compute} times</p>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(compute + 1)}>
        Click me

Notice how the state is feeld via the useState “hook.” This exposes the setCount() order to the template. The template is recured by the educeed ingredient office, and is written in JSX. JSX allows the inline integration of the JavaScript office into the onClick attribute of the button ingredient, which interacts with the ingredient state. The state is also accessed via the {compute} evidence in the template markup.


Vue adopts a “regular JSON object as state” philosophy. Any time you can just use the speech itself, it’s a win for artlessness. So you’ll find Vue singler in this respect than React’s setState(), for sample. However, there are edge cases and caveats that lastly mean you are intercourse with a indigenous-JSON-hybrid beast.

In a perception, Vue is somewhere between Angular and React, a compromise between Angular’s top-down design and React’s fundamental growth.

Despite being the newest contender, and lacking the backing of a big confirmation, Vue has kept pace with educements and delivers a fully viable framework. Also, there are a number of condition plug-ins and kits for Vue (like Quasar and Vuetify).

Vue has a reputation for being the easiest to acquire. That probably derives from its JSON data standard and HTML-with-decoration view determinations (versus React’s JSX). Vue templates can also incorporate inline JavaScript offices, unlike JSX.

Vue proposes Vuex as its built-in, centralized state treatment solution.

Vue ingredient sample

Listing 3 shows a single ingredient determination in Vue, from the Vue docs.

// Define a new ingredient named button-opposed
Vue.ingredient(`button-opposed`, {
  data: office () {
    recur {
      compute: 0
  template: `<button v-on:click="compute++">You clicked me {{ compute }} times.</button>`

In Listing 3, you can see that the ingredient is shiped as a CommonJS module. This is the Vue specialty for defining the ingredient code. The template is identified as the template limb.

Within the object that the module ships is the data limb. This is a office that recurs an object defining the ingredient’s state.

Notice that the template allows for HTML with inline directives like v-on:click, correspondent to Angular’s (click) or React’s onClick. The syntax in Vue for outputting bound changeables is the same as Angular: {{compute}}.

Performance comparison

Performance can be tricky to get a feel on. This excellent article proposes a data-based comparison of the three frameworks in three areas: DOM manipulation, load time, and remembrance allocation.

In the categories: Angular wins for DOM manipulation (in most cases); Vue wins for load times; React and Angular win for remembrance allocation.

In general, it’s not terribly precious to make a accomplishment-based determination among the frameworks. How you use them will make the biggest contact on accomplishment.

Native support and server-side rendering

Although Vue and Angular also support to-indigenous features and server-side rendering, React seems to be care well advanced in provisions of the artlessness in using these. JSX has a good feel for me personally, in that it keeps kindred code and layout close unitedly. Others have had a less lucky experience with it. Overall, I compute JSX as a real for React.

Which framework to use?

The question as to which technology is best is impracticable to say definitively. There are quantitative differences, but in the end it is a qualitative determination.

As with many technology choices, outer factors can play a big role. In particular, your familiarity with the frameworks and that of your team will weigh heavily. Availability of educeers who know the tech is also introduceant, and in that arena, React is the clear winner. The React project also seems the most committed to proposeing advanced-looking alterations.

[ InfoWorld’s 2021 Technology of the Year Award winners: The best software educement, cloud computing, data analytics, and machine acquireing products ]

That being said, Angular stands out as an architectural framework capable of intercourse with big-scale projects in a congruous and powerful way. And Vue proposes an easier acquireing curve with a singler state standardling and occurrenceing order.

In the end, it would be mental to get a feel for each framework, shrewd that each is powerful technology, with excellent aggregation support and on-going educement.